|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 14:19:20 GMT -8
Firstly on the matter of human remains found by Flume Trail : This is confirmed by detectives working for Carson City Sheriff's Office and officers for Carson City Search and Rescue Unit. Namely that a human skull and other unspecified human remains were found by Flume Trail.
The skull and other human remains were then sent to Washoe County Medical Examiner's Office - where we presume they have remained.
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 14:48:18 GMT -8
On the matter of the the solution to Z340, which I refer to as the REAL solution : It contains 6 polyalphabetic symbols deployed in exactly the same way as the 8 polyalphabetic symbols deployed in the REAL solution to Z408 - which was offered by ''concerned citizen'' two days following the Harden's version. The Hardens solution is correct - apart from failing to make use of polyalphabetic symbols, which would have corrected a few more spelling errors.
Oranchak, Blake and Van Eycke are in denial that any polyalphabetic symbols were deployed in either the 408 or 340 ciphers.
Further to this, the REAL Z340 solution contains extensive concealed messaging read vertically on the grid system meant to be read only in conventional horizontal fashion. The concealed messaging, akin to book-binding of a book tells the story in more detail of the murder of two Black Panther Party student leaders on January 17th 1969 at UCLA's Campbell Hall, and implicates FBI involvement. This concealed messaging is laid out in the shape of The Bident of Hades.
Oranchak, Blake and Van Eycke are in denial that there was any concealed messaging in the Z340. Indeed, there wasn't any noticed nor found in their effort, sanctioned by the FBI - WITHOUT CA DOJ APPROVAL.
The REAL solution was submitted to a Department of Justice originally - The Crown Office, for which I received FORMAL thanks, in June 2017.
That's just to start with, S. Hampton - but you are free to come to your own conclusions.
What experience do you have S.Hampton, in Cryptology ?
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 15:09:20 GMT -8
No experience, which might be the better avenue to judge what makes sense. That's all I'm saying.
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 15:20:15 GMT -8
"Human remains were found ..." The problem with this is, that the human remains have not been identified (by you or LE) as Donna's.
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 15:22:06 GMT -8
"The Crown Office"! Sounds fictional ...
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 15:35:13 GMT -8
Well, it is never my intention to belittle anyone with no experience, and ought not to impede examining the case by a majority of Zodiac followers. I have no experience in bio-chemistry for example, and can only make assessments on claims or otherwise about DNA.
But two years on now, Oranchak, Blake and Van Eycke are currying LESS support for their FBI- assisted claims - NOT MORE.
Between the three of them, they have computer experience, and not much more. Sam Blake is not a qualified pure mathematician - but a quantitative analyst. There is an ocean of difference between that mathematical application and the study of proof, logic, art and science of mathematics.
The Hardens were very bright, well-educated and ''most important'' held a gift for crossword puzzles, with a life-time's experience.
Whatever talents can do the job of cipher-breaking. But for the Zodiac's ciphers, computer skills alone is not going to be enough.
The FBI's sham and hoax will be fully exposed in time, and there will be no more presentations of Oranchak & Co's simulation effort - if the FBI obey the warning given to them on May 14th 2022.
Yes, after 18 months, the CA DOJ had had quite enough of the many and varied misinformation coming from the FBI - and their unfortunate stooges Oranchak & Co.
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 15:41:14 GMT -8
Whatever it sounds like, The Crown Office has more than 500 years as an institution of law. The basis of all law in Western countries holds affiliations to it, and really goes back a further 500 years to the Magna Carta.
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 15:51:04 GMT -8
You, Rubislaw32 said: "The Crown Office has more than 500 years as an institution of law." What does the average Joe in Hampton Roads know about that? And what kind of credence can Joe give to your banking on the importance of the "Crown Office"? Lacking! Further, are you, Rubis"law"32 an attorney out there in the Golden State? You speak with (some) legal confidence ...
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 16:03:23 GMT -8
There is too much of the case to examine, without closet trouble makers S Hampton.
If you were to bother yourself with reading this thread, you would find that I have had dealings with a number of law enforcement agencies, including NCIS, The Crown Office and various police departments going back 15 years.
If you are not going to actually put something on the table for members and visitors to this site - then I suggest you go elsewhere ?
Or, you might consider applying for membership here, and start imparting the knowledge of the case you claim to have, by creating some threads.
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 16:20:59 GMT -8
Gosh! Rubislaw32 said: "If you are not going to actually put something on the table for members and visitors to this site - then I suggest you go elsewhere ? Or, you might consider applying for membership here, and start imparting the knowledge of the case you claim to have, by creating some threads."
Is that an ultimatum? Whether or not, I'm leaning towards the latter, to "apply" for membership. Are you a screener as to whether or not I am "putting stuff on the table"? I have plenty to put on the table. The question is, will it compromise my case at it pertains to bringing Z to justice. And, ... are you of the legal profession. I may need your legal mind to serve as a filter as I provide more and more evidence. Are you in?
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 16:32:16 GMT -8
It's your choice to make. I don't exist to hold your hand over what you claim to have.
You could always dare yourself ?
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 16:48:35 GMT -8
Fair enough. You're not in. Therefore, I resort to my "Caution required" position as previously stated. As Brian Hartnell inquired to the perp: "Is your gun really loaded"?, I repeat my question to you: Are you of the legal profession?
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 17:08:58 GMT -8
Members and visitors have yet to find out anything constructive about you or your claims S. Hampton.
That's what we are all mostly in it for - more knowledge.
You should try elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by S. Hampton on Dec 9, 2022 17:40:24 GMT -8
Really? You stated: "Members and visitors have yet to find out anything constructive about you or your claims S. Hampton. That's what we are all mostly in it for - more knowledge. You should try elsewhere."
You see, Rubislaw32? You are, unfairly, speaking on behalf of "members and visitors" and that they "have yet to find out anything constructive about you or your claims S. Hampton."
I ask you Rubislaw32, did you already poll them (members and visitors), in the last 10 minutes, to determine that they have yet to find out anything constructive about "me or my claims"? Answer: NO! You, in the same manner that you accuse your nemesis, the FBI, and associated characters, are controlling the narrative by spouting fake news. You have no clew, at least at this point, as to what the "members and visitors" have determined to be constructive about my claims. Shame on you!
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Dec 9, 2022 18:11:27 GMT -8
The solution to your personal conundrum is called ''turnstile numbers'' - there are a counted quantity of Zodiac followers that choose to visit this site every day searching for more knowledge about the Zodiac case. The fact that they return indicates that they found something previously that ''might'' add to their knowledge.
The inanity and now repetitive nature of your questioning merely confirms to anyone reading that you have no intention of offering information of your own.
Some ''might'' think that you have nothing to offer anyway ?
Why don't you disprove this by offering something ?
Otherwise seeking another site would be the best advice I can offer you.
|
|