|
Post by Zydeco on Jun 2, 2015 15:38:12 GMT -8
I don't do computers. Apart from what I knew about the Illuminati from literature (such as Yeats) I knew nothing about this until a few months ago. I clicked on this in my browser history, but discovered that while I was asleep, the website was removed from Google. No doubt coincidence. However, I found another person's posting of the video.
I'm sorry it's an alleged Christian website with homophobic baggage. Filter that out, along with the woo. The thing is, it seems only evangelicals are investigating the Illuminati, and only because they believe in Satan. They're using it, to sell their own product.
Shame on us. Delicious irony, don't you think, that most of the people exposing mind control seem to be those under the biggest and most effective form of mind control in history? They try to cut off Satanists' heads before they cut their own off. And don't get me started about that MI5 stooge, David Icke.
Sine I was 5, I have (usually) had a sort of knack for telling when people are lying. And in my opinion, a certain person, shall we say, is. To a lawyer, mens rea is much more important than motive. But to an investigator, motive is key.
Serious trigger alert if you watch the beginning of this video.
Remember the elusive Mr Fry? I said something about him and was seen as crazy? I thought I saw what he was saying, and everyone else jumped to another (equally plausible) conclusion. That is how I stumbled the long way round, to this video. At least I have learned how to get in touch with my pineal gland.
I'm going back to that JK Fry thread now.
See at 28:00. Or not. I don't mind. I rest my case. Oh, and I like the Mikado.
'We're very wide awake, the moon and I...'
|
|
|
Post by Zydeco on Jun 2, 2015 15:48:09 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Zydeco on Jun 2, 2015 15:58:15 GMT -8
Ha ha! Hilarious that Ronald Reagan is listed under 'artists and entertainers'! Yes, that's all he was. As well as Specky-Boy's pal. (Boy do I know a brilliant story about them!!) But the Zodiac is only an associate member of San Francisco's Bohemian Club. 'Weaving spiders come not here'. You'll get him now.
LE is ignoring my (substantial weight of circumstantial) evidence. (I mean specifically on him).
It's harder to do a jigsaw when you don't see the bigger picture. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. But I cannot identify him.
|
|
|
Post by rubislaw 32 on Jul 28, 2015 2:49:21 GMT -8
Motive of Zodiac ? To law enforcement,this is of primary importance,since it can facilitate solving his crimes.For the rest of us,it comes down to the need to understand the motivation of an Anglophilic petrol head [?],raised in a free and prosperous Western society [?],to unfurl his specific brand of moral corruption,to our incredulity.Serial Killing alone,is moral anarchy and an affront to a civilized society,who believes that it has invested thousands of years creating a higher order for the benefit of humankind.Zodiac reminds us that we are still carrying unwelcome passengers - that our ''vessel'' is not shipshape [?]. Irrespective of ''conditioning''by Zodiac's environment,at a base level,Zodiac turned into a bigot.This surely is the starting point of understanding [?].So,what was his gripe ? It could have been a numbered of shouldered problems for him.We know he hated the cops,and perhaps the military,also.So, ''Authority'' was probably high up on his ''shopping list'' [?]. Other ''personal issues''have been thrown into the ring - misogyny,for example. Rightly or wrongly,the one I believe I am beginning to uncover is a phobia for The Catholic Church.Controversial,I know - but what is ''uncontroversial'' in the context of his abominable deeds ? Can we discount ''Bloodlust'' ? It may have come later,but does appear that,initially at least,''slaying'' was a vehicle to display ''serious intent'' [?].
Any takers ?
|
|
|
Post by rubislaw 32 on Jul 28, 2015 5:27:39 GMT -8
Oh !,I forgot to mention loneliness - he sounds a right ''Billy no mates''.And although showing some intelligence,he could have bored for a World XI [?].
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Aug 8, 2015 21:05:54 GMT -8
I can see that this section is least likely to attract conjectures - perhaps unsurprisingly.For all the countless articles,books and general media documentation,it is rare to find a single case,where a very specific motive for Zodiac's actions is offered.''Into the mind of a serial killer'' at least presumes that some form of institutionalization lay at the heart of motive.
But ''Prime Motive'' - that which definitively initiated Zodiac's deeds - his ''raison d'etre''- remains elusive.
There is a woman,still alive to-day and in her eighties,whom I believe came closest to finding out.In 1973 her good friend succumbed to a nervous breakdown,having been given information that clearly sent her into a spiral of depression.Despite heart to heart confidences,she could not tell the woman the core of her despair.
If only she had told her friend,we wouldn't be where we are to-day.The Zodiac case would have been wrapped up very quickly.
Hopefully,the truth will emerge soon - but there may be a way to go,and that piece of information may yet remain elusive to police.
I just believe I know what it is.....that which constitutes ''the elusive'' prime motive.
But who is to say that I am right [?].
So,hats into the ring - anyone [?].
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Aug 9, 2015 0:41:24 GMT -8
....And before anyone wonders if I might tell,I am unable,for legal reasons.
What I can say is,that the laws that govern the land from which Zodiac comes,may impede the very process of law enforcement.
There lies the rub.
|
|
|
Post by Zydeco on Aug 9, 2015 14:30:49 GMT -8
Ain't that the truth? But there are no legal issues: we have veritas, and he loves Oscar Wilde. There are, however, staying alive issues. I'm not posting anymore, but just wanted to thank you. The VPD has joined ZK Site. I have a feeling you do know the motive. Something which would have been on the front page of all the papers of the world, the next day. And still would. Good luck, my friend.
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Aug 9, 2015 16:04:32 GMT -8
Thank you for your good wishes,Zydeco
It's a shame that you are off to the ''giant gaming house''.
This is the place to be...the quaint ''public library'',where the cool dudes hang out.
There will be revelations to come,and you will have missed the boat.
Farewell.
|
|
|
Post by WelshChappie on Oct 31, 2015 18:22:52 GMT -8
Can I interject to point? Rhetorical question because I think I will anyway.
No offence to anyone meant by this but how would I be seen if I came here and decided to declare that I have all the answers and I know everything, including the color & type of Zodiac underwear, but when, as many obviously will, member ask me for details or to tell them I actually know, I then responded to any anc all requests that are similar with:
I am presently unable to tell you what it is that only I know as I am, at present, not obliged legally to disclose anything that only I can know. Please, do not ask for evidence because I am unwilling to do that which is illegal. Please do not hesitate to believe everything I say and believe it without any evidence in support at all because this is, intellectually and undeniably, a brilliant and sensible thing to do! If I asked people to believe I was just over 17 feet tall but sadly I can't show you any proof in pictures due to legal complications and the possibility of Litigation being filed against me if I gave anybody any evidence at all to compel them to even remotely accept or believe I really was such a height, people wouldn't disbelieve me, nor would they believe me, they'd probably throw stones and rocks at me, then just ignore me.
If Detectives hauled you in and asked you what you know of this crime and it's wanted offender, would you tell the Detectives in replying that you really are sorry, However, your not at legal liberty to tell them? Detectives would likely then throw such silly allegations around the Interview Room "Charges of conspiracy to conceal and the likes thereof....and worst of all, refusing to testify under Oath when subpoena'd to do so will hear a response of 'Your in Contempt, Four Hundred Years in the Custody of California Dpt. of Corrections *BANG BANG BANG* slams the Judges gabble!
|
|
|
Post by Rubislaw32 on Nov 1, 2015 12:24:33 GMT -8
A point very well put by WelshChappie,there,and essentially true.I am guilty of this - but,in mitigation,one can get caught up in a moment,suddenly realizing that too much could be revealed,not in the best interests of others,as well as oneself.
I once revealed more than I needed,when questioned by Police,and ended up with a formal caution for a ''legal infringement''.That can be quite humiliating,and a lesson,one promises oneself not to repeat.Humans engaging,does not always go to plan - if there was a ''plan'' in the first place [?].
Sadly,we as members of organized societies,have justifiably become a bit jaundiced in recent years,when told ''truths'' by those with a different agenda.The expressions ''Weapons of mass destruction'' and ''Sexing up dossiers'' come to mind.
Probably best to be a dove,than revealing unconfirmed information,then finding oneself rushing a decision on it [?].
|
|